Gold Rate: ₹9447.86 /g Silver Rate: ₹106.17 /g
Follow on
Deals OTT Releases Gadgets Exams Accidents Crime Indian Railways Indian Armed Forces Airlines India Tamil Nadu Kerala Karnataka Maharashtra West Bengal Gujarat

Double Murder Verdict: TikTok Abirami and Partner Get Life Imprisonment

Share this article
Link copied!
Double Murder Verdict: TikTok Abirami and Partner Get Life Imprisonment

In a gruesome double murder case dating back to 2018, TikTok Abirami and her partner ‘Biryani Master’ Meenatchi Sundaram were sentenced to life imprisonment by the Kanchipuram Mahila Sessions Court. The crime involved mixing sleeping pills in milk and murdering Abirami’s two children in the Kunrathur area of Chennai.


Background of the Case

  • Accused: Abirami (mother), Meenatchi Sundaram (partner)
  • Victims: Abirami's own son and daughter
  • Method: Sleeping pills mixed in milk
  • Year of Incident: 2018
  • Motive: Abirami allegedly viewed her children as an obstacle to her extramarital relationship
  • Initial Court: Chengalpattu Mahila Court; later transferred to Kanchipuram Mahila Court

Trial & Courtroom Events

  • Due to the absence of a regular judge, Principal District Sessions Judge Semmal took over the trial.
  • On the day of verdict (Thursday), the judge ordered both accused to be produced by 10:30 AM, but they were brought late at 11:30 AM from Puzhal prison.
  • Judge Semmal rebuked police for the delay and warned that disciplinary action would be taken under three legal sections.
  • The reason cited by the police inspector: one of the accused had a medical emergency.

Verdict Highlights

AspectDetail
Primary AccusedAbirami
Secondary AccusedMeenatchi Sundaram
VerdictLife imprisonment for both
Fine₹5,000 each
Additional Punishment1 extra year if fine not paid

Judge’s Strong Observations

  • Judge Semmal expressed deep emotional distress, stating:

    “I wrote this judgment till 3:30 AM. That shows how much this case affected me.”

  • He noted the inhumanity of a mother killing her children for the sake of an illicit affair:

    “You could’ve chosen separation. Why kill the children? Many women in this country pray for children.”

  • The judge added:

    “If not for the moral limits of Gandhi's land, I would have sentenced you both to death. But I am constrained.”


Accused Pleas & Rejection

  • Abirami pleaded for reduced sentence citing the need to care for her elderly parents.
  • Meenatchi Sundaram said he had already spent 7 years in jail and had to care for his aged parents.
  • Both pleas were rejected. The judge insisted that mercy was not possible in a case involving the cold-blooded murder of children.

Courtroom Atmosphere

  • Abirami broke down upon hearing the verdict and collapsed, requiring support to regain composure.
  • She appeared in court with long polished nails and full makeup, despite years in prison — drawing public attention.
  • The Kanchipuram Mahila Court campus witnessed heightened emotion and tension during and after the judgment.

Conclusion

This verdict serves as a grim reminder of the brutal consequences of unchecked desire and the abuse of motherhood. While the court refrained from awarding the death penalty due to constitutional limitations, the judgment strongly condemned the nature of the crime. Life imprisonment was imposed to reflect the severity and irreversibility of the act.


Source : Read the Judgement Copy

India | Tamilnadu | Chennai
Share this article
Link copied!

You can now subscribe free to our RagaDecode whatsapp channel for updates

Subscribe
Back to Home

Quick Info

Who are the main accused in the 2018 Kunrathur double murder case?
The main accused are Abirami, also known as 'TikTok Abirami,' and her partner Meenatchi Sundaram, known as 'Biryani Master.'
What was the crime committed by Abirami and Meenatchi Sundaram?
They murdered Abirami’s two children by mixing sleeping pills into their milk in the Kunrathur area of Chennai in 2018.
What was the motive behind the double murder?
Abirami allegedly viewed her children as obstacles to her extramarital relationship with Meenatchi Sundaram and chose to kill them.
What was the verdict given by the Kanchipuram Mahila Sessions Court?
Both Abirami and Meenatchi Sundaram were sentenced to life imprisonment and fined ₹5,000 each, with an additional year in jail if the fine is not paid.
Which court delivered the final verdict in the case?
The verdict was delivered by the Kanchipuram Mahila Sessions Court after the case was transferred from the Chengalpattu Mahila Court.
What was the reaction of the judge during the verdict announcement?
Judge Semmal expressed emotional distress, saying he wrote the judgment till 3:30 AM and criticized the inhumanity of a mother killing her children for an affair.
Why was the death penalty not given in this case?
The judge stated that while the crime warranted the death penalty, he was constrained by the moral limits of the land and constitutional boundaries, hence chose life imprisonment.
What did the accused plead during sentencing?
Abirami pleaded for leniency citing the need to care for her elderly parents, and Meenatchi Sundaram mentioned his time already served and responsibility toward his aged parents. Both pleas were rejected.
What happened in court when the verdict was announced?
Abirami broke down and collapsed after hearing the life sentence. Her polished appearance drew public attention, and the courtroom atmosphere was emotionally charged.
Why did the judge rebuke the police during the trial?
The judge reprimanded police for bringing the accused late to court by an hour, warning disciplinary action under three legal provisions.
How long had the accused been in custody before the verdict?
Meenatchi Sundaram mentioned he had already spent 7 years in prison prior to the final sentencing in 2025.
What punishment was given if the accused failed to pay the fine?
If the ₹5,000 fine was not paid by either accused, they would each face an additional year of imprisonment.
How did the public react to Abirami’s courtroom appearance?
Her appearance—with long polished nails and full makeup despite being in prison—drew public attention and fueled discussions on her demeanor during the trial.
What message did the judge convey through the verdict?
The judge emphasized the irreversible nature of the crime and condemned the abuse of motherhood, stating the harsh sentence reflected the gravity of the act.
Did the court experience emotional tension during the proceedings?
Yes, the courtroom at the Kanchipuram Mahila Court was filled with emotion and tension during and after the announcement of the life sentences.

In-Depth Answers

Where did the crime take place?
The murders occurred in the Kunrathur area of Chennai, Tamil Nadu.
Who was the presiding judge during the verdict?
Principal District Sessions Judge Semmal presided over the case and delivered the final judgment.
How did the judge describe the impact of the case on him personally?
Judge Semmal noted that the emotional weight of the case led him to write the judgment until 3:30 AM, reflecting its deep personal impact on him.
Was there any medical emergency reported during the trial day?
Yes, the police inspector cited a medical emergency for one of the accused as the reason for their late arrival to court.
What broader social issues did the verdict highlight?
The case spotlighted the dangers of unchecked personal desires, the abuse of motherhood, and the moral responsibility of individuals in relationships involving children.
How old were Abirami’s children when they were killed?
Abirami’s two children were aged around 7 years (son Ajay) and 5 years (daughter Karnika) at the time of the incident in 2018.
Who was Abirami’s husband at the time of the incident?
Abirami was married to Vijay (also known as Vijayakumar), a bank employee in Chennai. He was the father of the two children and discovered their deaths after returning home from work in 2018.
Subscribe