Gold Rate: ₹9467.62 /g Silver Rate: ₹109.19 /g
Follow on
Deals OTT Releases Gadgets Exams Accidents Crime Indian Railways Indian Armed Forces Airlines India Tamil Nadu Kerala Karnataka Maharashtra West Bengal Gujarat

India Refutes Involvement in US Airstrikes on Iran Amid Operation Midnight Hammer

Share this article
Link copied!
India Refutes Involvement in US Airstrikes on Iran Amid Operation Midnight Hammer

New Delhi, June 2025 — In the wake of intensifying global scrutiny, the Indian government has firmly denied claims that the United States used Indian airspace to launch strikes on Iran. These speculations followed the high-profile Operation Midnight Hammer, a U.S.-led offensive that targeted Iranian nuclear facilities.

usindiadenied.png

Official Denial from India

Multiple online posts and social media threads recently alleged that India facilitated the United States in its air raids by granting access to its airspace. In response, India’s Press Information Bureau (PIB) activated its Fact Check Unit, which swiftly debunked the rumors, labeling them as "fake and misleading."

“There is no truth to the claims that Indian airspace was used in the U.S. bombing campaign,” stated the official release.

The clarification was aimed at calming the public and preventing the spread of misinformation that could potentially impact India's diplomatic standing amid an already fragile geopolitical atmosphere.

The Strike That Shook the Region

The U.S. military action—dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer—involved seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers originating from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. These aircraft reportedly conducted direct precision strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, avoiding any unauthorized airspace, including that of India.

U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Kaine presented a comprehensive map and mission timeline to the international media. The data confirmed that none of the B-2 bombers entered Indian airspace, reinforcing India's assertion of non-involvement.

Additionally, another squadron of B-2 bombers reportedly flew over the Pacific Ocean, acting as decoy formations to mislead Iranian radar systems.

India’s Diplomatic Stand

Following the U.S. strikes, Prime Minister Narendra Modi placed an urgent call to Iranian President Peshkan. The 45-minute conversation was aimed at de-escalating tensions and reaffirming India’s commitment to regional peace.

“India urges all parties to exercise restraint and engage in constructive dialogue,” said PM Modi during the call.

He also extended gratitude for the safe return of Indian nationals from Iran, underlining India’s focus on protecting its citizens amid rising hostilities in the Middle East.

Conclusion: India’s Neutral Posture

As the conflict between the U.S. and Iran escalates, India is carefully balancing its diplomatic responsibilities. By disavowing any military involvement, reiterating neutrality, and engaging in peaceful diplomacy, India seeks to play the role of a responsible global stakeholder.

While misinformation spreads rapidly in the digital age, India’s prompt rebuttal and clear communication reassert its non-aligned and sovereign stance in matters of foreign conflict.

India
Share this article
Link copied!

You can now subscribe free to our RagaDecode whatsapp channel for updates

Subscribe
Back to Home

Quick Info

Did the United States use Indian airspace during Operation Midnight Hammer?
No, the Indian government has denied these claims. The Press Information Bureau’s Fact Check Unit labeled the reports as 'fake and misleading,' and U.S. military data confirmed that their aircraft did not enter Indian airspace.
What was Operation Midnight Hammer?
Operation Midnight Hammer was a U.S.-led military operation conducted in June 2025 that involved airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities using B-2 Spirit stealth bombers.
Which aircraft were used in the operation against Iran?
Seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, originating from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, were used in the operation to carry out direct precision strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
What evidence supports India's denial of airspace use?
U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Kaine, presented mission maps and timelines showing the B-2 bombers' flight paths, which confirmed they did not enter Indian airspace.
Why did rumors about India’s involvement in the U.S. strike spread?
Speculations on social media and online platforms falsely claimed that India allowed the U.S. to use its airspace for military strikes against Iran, leading to misinformation.
How did India respond to the false claims?
India’s Press Information Bureau issued a formal denial and used its Fact Check Unit to label the claims as fake, aiming to prevent the spread of misinformation and protect diplomatic integrity.
What was the purpose of the U.S. airstrike on Iran?
The strike targeted three Iranian nuclear facilities, part of a broader U.S. strategy to counter potential nuclear threats from Iran.
Did the U.S. use any diversion tactics during the operation?
Yes, a second squadron of B-2 bombers reportedly flew over the Pacific Ocean to act as decoys, misleading Iranian radar systems during the operation.
What diplomatic actions did India take after the strike?
Prime Minister Narendra Modi had a 45-minute call with Iranian President Peshkan to urge de-escalation, promote dialogue, and reaffirm India’s commitment to regional peace.
Was India involved in the planning or execution of the U.S. operation?
No, India maintained a neutral position and clarified it was not involved in the operation, either directly or by permitting the use of its airspace.
What did PM Modi discuss with Iran's President?
PM Modi emphasized the importance of restraint, constructive dialogue, and peace. He also thanked Iran for ensuring the safety of Indian nationals during the crisis.
How is India positioning itself amid the U.S.–Iran conflict?
India is emphasizing its non-aligned status by denying military involvement, engaging diplomatically with both sides, and promoting peace and regional stability.
Why is misinformation about military conflicts dangerous?
False claims can damage international relations, cause public panic, and misrepresent a nation's foreign policy, which is why India swiftly addressed the fake reports.
What role does the PIB Fact Check Unit play?
The PIB Fact Check Unit verifies and debunks misinformation related to government affairs. In this case, it clarified that India did not assist the U.S. operation.
Why was India’s denial important on the global stage?
As tensions rise in the Middle East, India’s clear communication helps maintain its diplomatic credibility and non-aligned image in the international community.

In-Depth Answers

How did the U.S. military confirm airspace compliance?
The U.S. military released detailed mission data, including maps and flight logs, verifying that no Indian airspace was used during the operation.
Were any Indian nationals affected by the U.S.–Iran conflict?
The article notes that Indian nationals were safely returned from Iran, a point of gratitude highlighted by PM Modi in his call with the Iranian president.
What does this incident say about India’s approach to misinformation?
India’s quick denial and fact-checking show its proactive approach in combating digital misinformation and maintaining foreign policy clarity.
What message did India send to other global powers?
India reaffirmed its stance of sovereignty and neutrality, calling for peaceful solutions rather than military escalation in international conflicts.
How is India handling global geopolitical tensions?
India is navigating geopolitical conflicts by staying neutral, promoting diplomacy, ensuring citizen safety, and countering misinformation to maintain global trust.
What is the significance of India’s neutral posture?
India’s neutrality allows it to maintain diplomatic relationships with both the U.S. and Iran, promoting its role as a mediator and responsible global actor.
What impact could false claims have had if unaddressed?
Unaddressed misinformation could have harmed India-Iran relations, inflamed regional tensions, and compromised India's diplomatic standing globally.
Has India faced similar misinformation issues before?
While the article does not mention prior instances, this case highlights how rapidly misinformation can spread, prompting the need for real-time government response.
What is India’s position on military intervention abroad?
India traditionally maintains a non-interventionist policy, promoting peace, sovereignty, and diplomatic solutions over involvement in foreign military actions.
What lesson does this incident offer in the digital age?
The incident underscores the importance of real-time fact-checking and government communication to prevent misinformation from influencing public perception and diplomacy.
Subscribe Buy Me a Coffee